Access to allocation

Problems with Launchpads for Investors

Randomised access

• Lottery and auction allocation mechanisms

Unpredictable participation

• Many launchpads use lottery or auction systems to allocate IDO tokens, meaning investors have no guaranteed access to the projects they want to support.

• This randomness can be frustrating, especially for retail investors who have been actively following and supporting a project but may still miss out due to luck-based systems.

Uneven opportunities

• These models often favour larger investors who can afford to buy more tickets or bid higher in auctions, creating an imbalance where smaller retail investors are left with fewer chances to participate.

Low transparency

• Some lottery systems lack transparency, leaving investors unsure how allocation decisions are made.

• This can lead to mistrust in the platform, as investors may feel that certain participants are given unfair advantages.

Staking-based access

Staking-based access (high entry point, guaranteed allocation)

High barrier to entry

• Many launchpads require users to stake large amounts of their native tokens to access guaranteed IDO allocations.

• This creates a significant financial barrier for smaller investors, as they often cannot afford the upfront staking requirement to participate in top-tier projects.

Unequal opportunities

• Investors with larger holdings get access to more exclusive or better IDO allocations, while smaller investors are left with fewer opportunities, perpetuating a cycle where the wealthiest investors gain the most from new projects.

Stake dilution

• As more people join a launchpad and stake tokens, the individual staking value might become diluted.

• This means that even if an investor has a sizable amount staked, their odds of securing a meaningful allocation can diminish over time as more participants enter the platform.

---

The AdLunam Solution:

• Standard staking options available (70%)

• Engagement-based access (30%)